Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41686440›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Physician Variation in Early Sepsis Management.

Ithan D Peltan, Danielle Groat, Jorie Butler, Joseph R Bledsoe, Blessing S Ofori-Atta, Chaorong Wu, Angela P Presson, Tom H Greene, Matthew A Christensen, Fiona M Schroeder and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ithan D PeltanDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Danielle GroatDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jorie ButlerDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Joseph R BledsoeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Blessing S Ofori-AttaDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Chaorong WuDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Angela P PressonDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Tom H GreeneDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Matthew A ChristensenDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Fiona M SchroederOffice of Consumer Experience, Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
M Blakely MayOffice of Consumer Experience, Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Matthew H SamoreDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Catherine L HoughDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland.
Samuel M BrownDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

Measuring and Learning from Care Variation in SepsisR35GM151147 · NIGMS · IHC HEALTH SERVICES, INC. · PI Ithan Daniel Peltan · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
Prehospital Activation of ED Teams to Improve Sepsis CareK23GM129661 · NIGMS · IHC HEALTH SERVICES, INC. · PI PELTAN, ITHAN DANIEL · 2019 to 2023
$786k
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM129661NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM151147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prompt antimicrobial therapy is essential in sepsis, but accelerating antimicrobial administration may increase overtreatment. Objectives: To examine the extent of and factors associated with physician variation in time from emergency department (ED) presentation to antimicrobial administration (hereinafter termed door-to-antimicrobial time) for sepsis and to assess whether faster practice patterns are associated with overtreatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This explanatory mixed-methods study linked a quantitative retrospective cohort (July 1, 2013, to January 31, 2017) involving 30-day patient follow-up with prospective qualitative physician interview data (May 17, 2022, to June 28, 2023) at 4 Utah EDs. Participants included ED attending physicians and their patients meeting sepsis criteria (including intravenous antimicrobial administration) before ED departure. Data analysis occurred from 2021 to 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Assessment for physician door-to-antimicrobial time variation used a likelihood ratio test comparing a linear mixed-effects model incorporating physician-level random intercepts and patient-level covariates with a model without physician random effects. Empirical best linear unbiased predictions of the physician random intercepts (termed physician-predicted mean door-to-antimicrobial times) quantified variation. The primary analysis used a joint mixed-effects shared parameter model to evaluate the association of physicians' door-to-antimicrobial practice patterns with their overtreatment rate (infection ruled out on final retrospective adjudication). Qualitative analysis of semistructured cognitive task analysis interviews compared ED physicians in the fastest and slowest door-to-antimicrobial time quartiles. Results: Quantitative analyses included 88 ED physicians (71 [80.7%] male; median age, 39 [IQR, 35-49] years) and 9810 patients with sepsis (median age, 63 [IQR, 48-75] years), of whom 4635 (50.5%) were female and 3540 (38.6%) received antimicrobials more than 3 hours after ED arrival. The median number of patient encounters per physician was 105 (IQR, 75-129). Physicians' door-to-antimicrobial time varied significantly (likehood ratio test P < .001), with average physician-level estimated mean door-to-antimicrobial time of 184 (95% estimation interval, 146-222) minutes for a typical patient, but was not associated with overtreatment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI 0.94-1.02] per 10-minute increase in physician estimated mean door-to-antimicrobial time; P = .37). Among 18 physicians interviewed, physicians with faster door-to-antimicrobial times emphasized proactive, parallel task execution and care team coordination, while physicians with slower times described a more reactive and stepwise sepsis evaluation and treatment process. Conclusions and Relevance: In this mixed-methods study, ED physicians' antimicrobial administration time for sepsis varied significantly, but faster antimicrobial initiation practice patterns were not associated with overtreatment. Physicians with shorter door-to-antimicrobial times described a proactive, parallel processing approach to sepsis care.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsPractice Patterns, Physicians'SepsisTime-to-TreatmentAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOvertreatmentRetrospective StudiesUtahAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID41686440
PMCPMC12905659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.