ArticleApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2026
Humming Breathing and Autonomic Regulation: A Preliminary Study of Resonance Frequency and Vibratory Mechanisms.
Article in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether the effects of humming breathing (Bhramari Pranayama) on the autonomic nervous system were caused by vibratory sounds or specific respiratory patterns. Twenty-four healthy adults participated in four randomized sessions (rest, deep breathing, humming breathing, and calm humming breathing) completed over five consecutive days. Humming involved a vocalized "mm" sound, while calm humming additionally used noise-canceling earphones for auditory occlusion. Heart rate variability (HRV) was measured, and respiration-related indices were estimated from HRV-derived respiratory sinus arrhythmia patterns. Visual analog scale (VAS) responses were collected for stress, anxiety, confidence, and relaxation. Humming and calm humming breathing produced significantly slower and more stable breathing patterns than rest and deep breathing, with respiratory frequency clustering near 0.1 Hz. Day-to-day respiratory variability was lower during humming-based breathing than during rest and deep breathing. As respiratory frequency converged toward ~ 0.1 Hz, regulated breathing conditions showed an overall pattern of increased HRV compared with rest, including higher root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), total power (TP), and low-frequency (LF) power. No significant differences were observed between humming and calm humming breathing for respiratory or HRV measures. The VAS analysis revealed no significant differences across the breathing conditions. The effects of humming breathing appear to be associated with the 0.1 Hz resonance frequency induced by extended exhalation rather than the vibratory sound itself. Humming breathing, which does not require a biofeedback device, may serve as a practical alternative to cyclic breathing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41686399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.