ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Local treatment for metastatic and primary sites in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the combination immunotherapy era: a narrative review.
Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in immuno-oncology (IO)-based systemic therapies have improved treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, long-term survival of these patients remains challenging, highlighting the need to reassess the role of local and metastasis-directed treatments. Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has traditionally been a part of the therapeutic armamentarium for mRCC, and evidence from the targeted therapy era-most notably the CARMENA and SURTIME trials-indicates that deferred CN after initial systemic therapy may benefit carefully selected patients. In the IO era, prospective evidence regarding CN is lacking, although ongoing trials, such as NORDIC-SUN and PROBE, are expected to refine patient selection and optimal timing. Real-world analysis reveals a significant decline in conducting CN since 2018. However, CN remains associated with improved overall survival of patients who received several IO-based first-line regimens after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Metastasis-directed treatments, including metastasectomy and local interventions for bone metastases, continue to exhibit potential survival benefits and may maintain functional status when complete resection of lesions is achievable. Considering the absence of definitive prospective data applicable to routine clinical practice, individualized treatment strategies should consider CN and local therapies alongside systemic treatment response, tumor biology, and patient-specific prognostic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.