ArticleAnimal cognition2026
An animal model of radiological medical image reading: detection of lung abnormalities in multi-slice CT by pigeons (Columba livia).
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate detection of pathologies like pulmonary lung nodules is critical as they can be a marker of a potential cancerous, life-threatening condition. The detection of such nodules, however, is a difficult visual task requiring extensive radiological training. But, considering this process as a perceptual categorization task generates avenues for using pigeons to understand the underlying visual processes as these birds are experts at categorizing objects and behaviors visually, using a highly flexible and accurate visual cognition. Using a go/no-go paradigm, we presented six pigeons with short movies of CT sections that contained a solid lung nodule (Abnormal) or CT sections without nodules (Normal). Half the pigeons were reinforced for pecking during Abnormal, and the other half during Normal. Pigeons learned to detect the nodules and generalized their discrimination to novel exemplars, indicating the use of implicit visual categorization processes. Critically, this categorization transferred to different, visually distinct abnormalities (emphysema and ground glass nodules). Hence, pigeons can be employed as an animal model for evaluating perceptual processes during abnormality detection and may give insight into novel radiological training optimized by pigeons’ implicit visual cognitive mechanisms instead of explicit didactic instruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.