ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Worldwide paediatric surgical practice regarding post-reconstruction anal dilatation in anorectal malformation: an international survey.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess current worldwide practice regarding routine post-operative dilatations (RPD) following reconstruction for ARM. To determine whether surgeons would consider participating in a prospective study or randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing RPD versus no RPD.
methodsWe circulated a Google forms survey to members of the European Paediatric Surgical Association (EUPSA), United Kingdom Paediatric Colorectal Group (UKPCG), delegates at the 2022 EUPSA international congress and the 2022 Simpson Smith Symposium. We recorded the name and country of responding surgeons; the volume of cases managed and the practice of RPD. Surgeons were asked if they would be willing to change their local protocols and enter patients into a RCT.
resultsWe received 134 responses from 114 centres in 48 countries across 5 continents. One hundred and five (92%) centres performed RPD on all patients; 2 (2%) centres performed RPD based on surgeon preference; 7 (6%) centres did not perform RPD. 71 surgeons (60%) stated they would be willing to change their local protocol for the purposes of a RCT.
conclusionsThe vast majority of centres perform RPD following reconstruction for ARM. However, there appears to be increased interest in participation in a RCT to compare dilatations versus no dilatations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41686274What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.