ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026
Integrating genomic predictions into an applied Central European wheat breeding program.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving hybrid breeding efficiency in winter oilseed rape under sparse multi-environment testing.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Optimizing phenotypic data analysis strategies to enhance genomic prediction in winter wheat breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageGenomic prediction is most effective when balancing heritability and population size; advanced breeding stages suit complex traits, broader training sets improve predictions in simple traits-enabling efficient, earlier selection. Genomic selection can reduce generation intervals and costs, thereby increasing genetic gain in plant breeding. The study aimed to assess the impact of phenotypic data quality, sample size, and diversity across different breeding stages on the accuracy of genomic predictions. We used phenotypic data of the Central European winter bread wheat breeding company W. von Borries-Eckendorf GmbH & Co. KG, comprising 13,773 genotypes evaluated in up to 95 environments in nearly 57,000 plots for grain yield, plant height, protein content and yellow rust resistance. Genotypic data for 6,228 genotypes were generated using a 7,000 SNP Illumina Infinium assay. We implemented genomic best linear unbiased prediction and tested prediction ability within and across breeding stages. Three prediction scenarios were evaluated to examine the prediction ability: (1) within individual breeding stages, (2) across breeding stages, and (3) for most advanced genotypes. Results indicate more accurate models trained on mid- or late-stage phenotypic data for most traits compared to early-stage data. Combining mid- and late-stage data further improved predictions for complex traits like grain yield and yellow rust resistance. These findings highlight the importance of balancing high heritability and appropriate training sets for optimizing genomic predictions, demonstrating the potential of genomic selection as a cornerstone for wheat breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.