Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41686201›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026

[Assisted suicide in the media-a narrative review].

Emilia Gögl, Sebastian Scherr, Markus Schäfer, Georg Fiedler, Frank Schwab

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emilia GöglFakultät für Humanwissenschaften, Lehrstuhl Medienpsychologie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Oswald-Külpe-Weg 82, 97074, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Sebastian ScherrPhilosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Chair of Digital Health Communication, Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland.
Markus SchäferFakultät Kultur, Medien, Psychologie, Hochschule Macromedia, Frankfurt, Deutschland.
Georg FiedlerDeutsche Akademie für Suizidprävention e. V. (DASP), Kassel, Deutschland.
Frank SchwabFakultät für Humanwissenschaften, Lehrstuhl Medienpsychologie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Oswald-Külpe-Weg 82, 97074, Würzburg, Deutschland. frank.schwab@uni-wuerzburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Media portrayals of assisted suicide and their impact on recipients have so far received insufficient scholarly attention. This article provides an initial overview of international research on news coverage, films, television, and social media that deal with this topic. Qualitative content analyses dominate the academic literature, while empirical studies on the effects of portrayals of assisted suicide are largely absent. Media coverage of this topic navigates the tension between individual autonomy, social responsibility, and the potential normative influence of public communication. Despite media guidelines, the topic is often emotionalized and presented on the basis of individual cases, many of which implicitly advocate for assisted suicide. This sometimes conveys the message that a life with suffering is not worth living. Furthermore, alternatives to assisted suicide-such as comprehensive palliative care-are rarely discussed. There is evidence suggesting that media reports on assisted suicide can trigger imitation effects. Due to the limited number of studies and methodological shortcomings, it is currently not possible to draw far-reaching conclusions. However, particularly with regard to potential media effects, systematic research on the coverage and portrayal of assisted suicide is of critical importance.

Indexed as

Mass MediaSuicide, AssistedGermanyHumansMedia ExposureAssisted suicideContent analysesImitation effects (Werther Effect)MediaPublic communication

Identifiers

PMID41686201
PMCPMC12957067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.