Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41686001›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Is repulsive serial bias in visual perception driven by adaptation mechanisms?

Scott Janetsky, Kuo-Wei Chen, Gi-Yeul Bae

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Scott JanetskyDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Kuo-Wei ChenDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Gi-Yeul BaeDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reported perception can exhibit a repulsive bias away from a task-irrelevant prior stimulus. Previous research has suggested that this repulsive serial bias is driven by low-level adaptation, such that the prior stimulus repels the representation of the new stimulus during encoding. To test this account, the present study compared the repulsive serial bias with another perceptual bias that is known to be driven by an adaptation mechanism (e.g., the tilt aftereffect). We measured the repulsive serial bias using a common location delayed estimation task and the adaptation-driven bias using a location estimation task with an inducer stimulus. We found that, although both repulsive serial bias and adaptation-driven bias were evident, the two biases were not correlated. In addition, only the repulsive serial bias was associated with a response time effect, where responses were slower when the bias was stronger. Moreover, mouse-tracking data for the repulsive serial bias exhibited a pattern that started with a stronger repulsion and ended with smaller repulsion, which cannot be explained by an adaptation mechanism alone. Taken together, our findings suggest that repulsive serial bias in continuous estimation tasks involves post-perceptual decisional processes that are not present in the adaptation-driven bias.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41686001
PMCPMC12922714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.