Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41685887›Full record

ArticleFamily process2026

Turning Everything Upside Down: The Impact of Illness on Romantic Relationships-A SEM-Based Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.

Franziska Reinhardt, Imad Maatouk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family process, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Franziska ReinhardtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Integrated Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7946-0960
Imad MaatoukDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Integrated Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-1182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Illnesses are often associated with fundamental changes in relationship dynamics. Yet, little is known about how different acute and chronic conditions distinctly impact both partners' well-being. This study analyzed the reciprocal associations between different illnesses on life satisfaction and relationship satisfaction in partnerships. Based on data from the Family Demographic Panel (FReDA), 14,426 people were analyzed in a two-stage analysis process. In the first step, a Welch-ANOVA examined disease-specific differences in life satisfaction as a function of partnership status, focusing on the well-being of the ill individual. In the second step, an extended Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) was applied to partnered dyads, shifting the focus to the healthy partner and analyzing how the illness of one partner and relational factors are associated with the partner's relationship and life satisfaction. The results revealed substantial crossover effects, with consistent partnership-related patterns across illness types. Disease severity and duration were negatively associated with relationship satisfaction, whereas intimacy and constructive conflict resolution emerged as universal protective factors. These findings underscore the relevance of a systemic perspective in healthcare and show the need for partnership-oriented interventions.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPersonal SatisfactionSexual PartnersAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalYoung Adultactor‐partner interdependence modelchronic illnessdyadic copingrelationship satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID41685887
PMCPMC12903840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.