ReviewEuropean endodontic journal2025
Artificial Intelligence in The Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognostication in Endodontics: A Comprehensive Literature Review.
Review in European endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Performance of AI-Based Cloud Software Regarding the Detection of Endodontic Findings on CBCT: A Single-Centre Cross-Sectional Validation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this article is to conduct a comprehensive review of the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in endodontics, focusing on optimizing diagnosis, supporting clinical decision-making, and predicting treatment outcome. Additionally, its limitations and areas for improvement are analysed. Information was gathered through a search in scientific databases such as PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, selecting studies published in English between 2016 and 2025. After applying exclusion criteria and removing duplicates, 51 articles were included. The main applications of AI in endodontics are grouped into three areas. In Diagnosis, AI models based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), such as Diagnocat, have demonstrated accuracy greater than 90% in detecting periapical lesions using radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Likewise, AI algorithms have successfully identified vertical root fractures with high precision in CBCT images. In the analysis of root and canal morphology, deep learning models have shown high accuracy in detecting C-shaped root canals and other anatomical variations. Regarding treatment, deep learning models can predict case complexity and improve treatment planning. Additionally, neural network-based algorithms have outperformed traditional electronic apex locators in determining root canal length. In terms of prognosis, AI models have achieved 95.6% accuracy in predicting pain after root canal treatment (RCT). AI also aids in predicting the success of non-surgical endodontic retreatments. This study demonstrates how AI is revolutionising endodontics by improving diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and outcome prediction. However, it faces limitations such as the need for large datasets, high costs, and lack of self-development. Future studies should address these challenges to enhance its integration into clinical practice. (EEJ-2025-05-072).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.