ArticleEuropean endodontic journal2025
Effect of Pre-Endodontic Sealing on the Microleakage of Temporary Restorative Materials After Endodontic Treatment: An In Vitro Study.
Article in European endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of preendodontic build-up on irrigant penetration in extracted single-rooted premolars: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of various commercial temporary restorative materials in preventing microleakage with a pre-endodontic sealing technique (PES).
methodsNinety-six human single-rooted premolars were prepared for endodontic access and randomly allocated to five groups according to the material to restore the cavity (n=16): CON: Control group, Tetric N-bulk, Ivoclar; COL: Coltosol, Coltene; KET: Ketac Molar, 3M; FUJ: Gold Label Fuji II, GC; CLI: Clip F; and two experimental conditions (n=8): COT: conventional technique and, PES technique. Methylene blue dye penetration was measured in mm. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc were used (p<0.05) Results: For most materials, PES exhibited statistically significantly lower values of dye penetration (p < 0.001), except for KET and COL. The highest dye penetration was found in FUJ using the COT technique.
conclusionThe PES technique was more effective in preventing microleakage when polymer-based materials were used. (EEJ-2025-02-027).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.