ReviewCurrent opinion in anaesthesiology2026
Real-time, artificial intelligence-guided intraoperative resuscitation and fluid management in trauma anesthesia.
Review in Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo synthesize recent advances in intraoperative resuscitation for trauma surgery, including fluid composition, transfusion thresholds, and coagulopathy management, and to identify emerging directions that address persistent gaps in precision. Particular attention is given to prospective evidence, as forward-looking evaluations better capture real-world performance, workflow integration, and clinical impact, culminating in the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning as the next stage of innovation. RECENT
findingsMajor trials over the past 5 years have refined evidence for balanced transfusion ratios, restrictive transfusion thresholds, and the transition from crystalloid to hemostatic and physiology-guided strategies. However, outcome variability underscores the need for individualized, data-driven resuscitation. Early prospective machine learning evaluations - along with the US Food and Drug Administration-cleared point-of-care systems such as APPRAISE-HRI - demonstrate that multimodal physiologic modeling can predict hemorrhage and fluid responsiveness as accurately as expert clinicians, while offering real-time monitoring and guidance. SUMMARY: The field is shifting from protocol-based to precision-guided trauma resuscitation. Future progress will rely on randomized-controlled-trial-validated, adaptive, human-in-the-loop artificial intelligence workflows that integrate continuous physiologic data with clinical judgment to enhance the timing, composition, and safety of intraoperative fluid and transfusion therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.