ArticleACS synthetic biology2026
GCAD: A Computational Framework for Mammalian Genetic Program Computer-Aided Design.
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic programs can direct living systems to perform diverse, prespecified functions. As the library of parts available for building such programs continues to expand, computation-guided design is increasingly helpful and necessary. Predictive models aid the challenging design process, but iterative simulation and experimentation are intractable for complex functions. Computer-aided design accelerates this process, but existing tools do not yet capture the behavior of mammalian-specific parts and population-level effects needed by mammalian synthetic biologists. To address these needs, we developed a framework for mammalian genetic program computer-aided design. Starting with a user-defined design specification to quantify circuit performance, the framework uses a genetic algorithm to search through possible designs. Circuit space is defined by a library of experimentally characterized parts and dynamical systems models for gene expression in a heterogeneous cell population. We developed this genetic algorithm using a directed graph-based formulation with biologically constrained rules to explore regulatory connections and parts. We evaluated the framework for design problems of varying complexity, including programs we describe as an amplifier, signal conditioner, and pulse generator, demonstrating that the algorithm can successfully find optimal circuit designs. Finally, we experimentally evaluated selected circuits, demonstrating the path from a predicted circuit design to experimental testing and highlighting the importance of characterization in enabling predictive design. Overall, this framework establishes general approaches that can be refined and expanded, accelerating the design and implementation of mammalian genetic programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.