Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41685630›Full record

ArticlePalliative & supportive care2026

Interventions for unpaid carers of people living with breathlessness due to chronic respiratory diseases: Scoping review.

Eleanor Rochester, Nikel-Shaniece Hector-Jack, Glenn Robert, Charles Reilly, Matthew Maddocks, Lisa Brighton, Wei Liu, Assma Ibrahimi, Irene Higginson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eleanor RochesterCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0095-5333
Nikel-Shaniece Hector-JackCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Glenn RobertMethodologies Division, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Charles ReillyCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Matthew MaddocksCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Lisa BrightonCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Wei LiuDepartment of Engineering, Faculty of Natural, Mathematical and Engineering Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Assma IbrahimiFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Irene HigginsonCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCarers of people living with breathlessness face common challenges due to the chronic, distressing and unpredictable nature of the symptom. These include unmet information and support needs resulting in worsened health and psychosocial outcomes. This review aimed to (1) identify the relative volume of studies on supportive interventions for carers of people living with breathlessness due to different respiratory diseases, (2) characterize the nature of the interventions, and (3) explore their reported effectiveness on outcomes identified by carers as being important.

methodsMedline and CINAHL were searched for studies reporting interventions targeting unpaid adult carers of people with breathlessness, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD) published 2000-2025. Intervention characteristics and reported outcomes were extracted and compared across diagnoses and intervention categories. Our findings were shaped by consultation with unpaid carers in a series of patient and public involvement workshops.

resultsFrom 72 included interventions, three approaches were identified: Education, therapeutic support, and interventions for patient management. Interventions for lung cancer carers most frequently offered therapeutic support to the carer, while those for COPD carers most frequently focused on managing the patient. COPD and ILD carers have been underserved by research. We found few therapeutic support interventions for COPD carers. Reporting of carer demographics was poor, including among RCTs. SIGNIFICANCE OF

resultsThere was a dominance of research focusing on carers of people with lung cancer (56% of participants). In PPI consultations, carers identified stigma and poor communication with health providers as factors contributing to the disparity between lung cancer and other respiratory diseases. More research is needed to compare the efficacy of different intervention strategies to improve outcomes that matter most to carers. To improve equity, researchers must consistently report carer demographics and prioritize developing interventions for carers underserved by research.

Indexed as

CaregiversDyspneaChronic DiseaseHumansSocial SupportbreathlessnessCOPDInterstitial Lung Diseaserespiratory diseaseUnpaid caregivers

Identifiers

PMID41685630
PMCPMC13166304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.