Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41685394›Full record

SynthesisPhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2026

Effects of Tibial Nerve Electrostimulation in Patients With Fecal Incontinence: A Systematic Review.

Janaina Dos Santos Sóstennes, Tainah Santos Lacerda, Marcos Venicius Bentes do Nascimento, Katiane da Costa Cunha, Rodrigo Santiago Barbosa Rocha, João Simão de Melo Neto, Erica Feio Carneiro

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Janaina Dos Santos SóstennesUniversidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Tainah Santos LacerdaUniversidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Marcos Venicius Bentes do NascimentoUniversidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6987-3215
Katiane da Costa CunhaUniversidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-5090
Rodrigo Santiago Barbosa RochaUniversidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5964-946X
João Simão de Melo NetoUniversidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Erica Feio CarneiroUniversidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveFecal incontinence (FI) is a condition characterized by the involuntary loss of stool, resulting from the inability to control the sphincter and neuromuscular mechanisms responsible for continence. Percutaneous electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve (posterior tibial nerve stimulation-PTNS) has been used as a therapeutic alternative in the treatment of FI. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy.

methodsA systematic review was conducted according to the recommendations and criteria described in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Guide to Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) items and in the Cochrane Manual. Experimental studies that evaluated the effects of posterior tibial nerve electrostimulation in adult patients with fecal incontinence were included. Case reports, literature reviews, and gray literature were excluded. The search was performed in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Regional Portal of the VHL, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases.

resultsSeventeen studies were included, totaling 1248 participants. The average duration of treatment protocols was 12 weeks, with predominantly weekly interventions. The most frequently used stimulation parameters included frequencies between 10 and 20 Hz and pulse widths of 200 μs. DISCUSSION: Most studies demonstrated a reduction of 50% or more in fecal incontinence episodes, as well as significant improvement in severity scores and quality of life. Randomized clinical trials presented a low risk of bias, while some observational studies demonstrated methodological limitations. PTNS is a minimally invasive intervention with a favorable safety profile and potential clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyFecal IncontinenceTibial NerveHumansTreatment Outcomefecal incontinenceneuromodulationposterior tibial nerve stimulationquality of life

Identifiers

PMID41685394
PMCPMC12902902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.