Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41685377›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters

Finite Element Analysis of Von Mises Stress in External Fixators for Open Tibial Fractures: A Comparative Study of ASTM F1541-02 and Tibia-Based Models in Indonesian Patients.

Muhammad Kozin, Muhammad Imam Ammarullah, Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf, Aghni Ulma Saudi, Siti Amalina Azahra, I Nyoman Jujur, Muhammad Hirzan Arrifqi, Moch Agus Choiron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad KozinResearch Center for Advanced Materials Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN) South Tangerang Banten Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5568-3126
Muhammad Imam AmmarullahBioengineering and Environmental Sustainability Research Centre University of Liberia Monrovia Montserrado Liberia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8845-7202
Abdulfatah Abdu YusufBioengineering and Environmental Sustainability Research Centre University of Liberia Monrovia Montserrado Liberia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8054-9022
Aghni Ulma SaudiResearch Center for Advanced Materials Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN) South Tangerang Banten Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8073-6234
Siti Amalina AzahraResearch Center for Advanced Materials Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN) South Tangerang Banten Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1240-8807
I Nyoman JujurResearch Center for Advanced Materials Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN) South Tangerang Banten Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6590-8798
Muhammad Hirzan ArrifqiZenith Allmart Precisindo Sidoarjo East Java Indonesia.
Moch Agus ChoironDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Engineering Universitas Brawijaya Malang East Java Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4052-4832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traffic accidents are the leading cause of traumatic fractures worldwide, with tibial fractures being the most common lower-extremity injury. Open tibial fractures pose significant clinical challenges due to their high risk of infection and non-union, requiring effective stabilisation. External fixators are widely used for this purpose, but their biomechanical performance must be evaluated under both standardised and patient-specific conditions. This study presents a finite element analysis of an external fixator tailored to Indonesian patients, using two frameworks: the ASTM F1541-02 standard protocol and a tibia-based model derived from patient geometry. Von Mises stress distributions were assessed under axial compression, torsional loading, and four-point bending. Results showed that stresses predicted by ASTM F1541-02 were consistently higher than those from the tibia-based model, particularly under torsion and bending, though all values remained below material yield strength. These findings indicate that the fixator design is safe, while emphasising that tibia-based modelling provides more physiologically realistic predictions. The study shows the importance of patient-specific anatomy in computational biomechanics and points to future directions in design optimisation and localized manufacturing.

Indexed as

biomechanicsbiomedical communicationhealth caremedical computing

Identifiers

PMID41685377
PMCPMC12892096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.