ArticleShoulder & elbow2026
Pilot biomechanical study of complex upper-limb movements in patients with RSA using inertial sensors: Feasibility of sport-specific gestures.
Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Step Count as a Digital Mobility Outcome-A Pilot Study on Differences Between the Upper and Lower Extremities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate recovery of complex upper-limb movements from a kinematic and biomechanical perspective in patients undergoing Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA), comparing movement quality during athletic gestures with healthy controls. Methods: Two groups were analyzed: patients with RSA and healthy individuals without shoulder pathology. Participants performed basic shoulder tasks (flexion-extension and abduction-adduction) and three athletic gestures of increasing complexity: boccia throw, golf swing, and padel víbora stroke. Kinematic data (joint angles, angular velocities, and accelerations) were collected using a wearable inertial motion analysis system (Movit System G1). Results: Controls demonstrated a greater range of motion (maximum joint angle: 184.0° vs. 144.03°), though differences were not statistically significant. Angular velocities and accelerations were largely comparable between groups, indicating that patients with RSA adopt conservative yet functional movement strategies. No significant differences were observed during the boccia throw or golf swing. The víbora stroke showed the highest variability but remained within functional limits in both groups. Conclusions: This pilot feasibility study suggests that patients with RSA can perform complex upper-limb and sport-specific movements with biomechanical patterns comparable to healthy individuals. Although limited by small sample size, large effect sizes indicate clinically relevant differences, supporting the need for larger, confirmatory studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.