Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41685340›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary neurosurgery : Advanced techniques and case management2025

Assessing survival and learning curves for EVD procedures in hemorrhagic stroke patients in a New York City hospital.

U S Govindarajulu, D Rivera, C Brown, E Reynolds, J Zhang, D Cohen, A Schupper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary neurosurgery : Advanced techniques and case management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

U S GovindarajuluCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Science & Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5864-7403
D RiveraIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.
C BrownIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.
E ReynoldsCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Science & Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.
J ZhangIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.
D CohenIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.
A SchupperDepartment of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.

Funding

Conduits: Mount Sinai Health System Translational Science HubUL1TR004419 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Rosalind J Wright · 2022 to 2026
$46.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR004419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Types of hemorrhagic stroke and other forms of bleeding within the cranial vault, account for a significant portion of neurological emergencies. External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is a common, life-saving intervention for patients presenting with acute hydrocephalus following intracranial hemorrhage. EVDs reduce intracranial pressure (ICP) by draining cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), minimizing the risk of secondary brain injury. Additionally, EVDs allow for continuous ICP monitoring, providing critical data to guide decisions. However, post-procedural complications may occur following EVD placement. While previous studies have examined EVD outcomes using traditional statistical methods, the impact of provider heterogeneity and resident learning curves on these outcomes remains poorly understood. Understanding the impact of these complications is crucial for improving surgical quality and outcomes. Methods: To address these critical gaps and advance our understanding of EVD outcomes, we reviewed medical records of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or interventricular hemorrhage (IVH) who received EVDs for ICP at the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City from 2019 to 2022. We evaluated surgical complications and patient outcomes following EVD placement by neurosurgeons at different stages of their training. Random effect survival models were implemented to account for heterogeneity between providers. This novel methodological approach integrated provider heterogeneity and learning curves into EVD outcome analysis, extending beyond traditional statistical methods used in previous studies. Conclusions: We found that in time-to-death Cox models, age was a significant predictor while for time-to-complication, device type and pre-operative modified Rankin score were significant predictors. A Cox frailty model did not show significant predictors, but our unique evaluation of restricted mean survival time with frailty showed that smoking was a significant predictor of survival. Furthermore, we also modeled learning curves amongst neurosurgeons performing EVDs to improve surgical proficiency. We found that employing the frailty modeling improved the learning curve fit.

Indexed as

EVD procedureFrailty modelLearning curvesNeurosurgeryRandom survival forestSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41685340
PMCPMC12893700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.