ArticleInterdisciplinary neurosurgery : Advanced techniques and case management2025
Assessing survival and learning curves for EVD procedures in hemorrhagic stroke patients in a New York City hospital.
Article in Interdisciplinary neurosurgery : Advanced techniques and case management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applications of survival analysis and learning curves methods in neurosurgical stroke data and simulations to account for provider heterogeneity.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Types of hemorrhagic stroke and other forms of bleeding within the cranial vault, account for a significant portion of neurological emergencies. External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is a common, life-saving intervention for patients presenting with acute hydrocephalus following intracranial hemorrhage. EVDs reduce intracranial pressure (ICP) by draining cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), minimizing the risk of secondary brain injury. Additionally, EVDs allow for continuous ICP monitoring, providing critical data to guide decisions. However, post-procedural complications may occur following EVD placement. While previous studies have examined EVD outcomes using traditional statistical methods, the impact of provider heterogeneity and resident learning curves on these outcomes remains poorly understood. Understanding the impact of these complications is crucial for improving surgical quality and outcomes. Methods: To address these critical gaps and advance our understanding of EVD outcomes, we reviewed medical records of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or interventricular hemorrhage (IVH) who received EVDs for ICP at the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City from 2019 to 2022. We evaluated surgical complications and patient outcomes following EVD placement by neurosurgeons at different stages of their training. Random effect survival models were implemented to account for heterogeneity between providers. This novel methodological approach integrated provider heterogeneity and learning curves into EVD outcome analysis, extending beyond traditional statistical methods used in previous studies. Conclusions: We found that in time-to-death Cox models, age was a significant predictor while for time-to-complication, device type and pre-operative modified Rankin score were significant predictors. A Cox frailty model did not show significant predictors, but our unique evaluation of restricted mean survival time with frailty showed that smoking was a significant predictor of survival. Furthermore, we also modeled learning curves amongst neurosurgeons performing EVDs to improve surgical proficiency. We found that employing the frailty modeling improved the learning curve fit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.