ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
The stem of
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, pruritic, inflammatory skin disorder. While the stem of Schisandra chinensis has been extensively studied for its pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and hepatoprotective effects, its therapeutic potential in AD remains to be elucidated. This study therefore aimed to investigate the effects of Methods: Chemical profiling of SCSE via UPLC-Q-Exactive-Orbitrap-MS revealed 45 constituents, with lignans comprising 80%. The primary active component was identified through activity-guided assays employing hyaluronidase inhibition and HPLC. The therapeutic efficacy of SCSE and its constituent Schisandrin B (Sch B) was assessed in an AD mouse model. Furthermore, network pharmacology predicted the involved signaling pathways, and these predictions were subsequently validated experimentally. Results: Sch B was identified as the core active component. Both SCSE and Sch B significantly improved skin barrier function in AD mice, as evidenced by reduced transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and upregulation of key barrier proteins (Filaggrin, Loricrin, and Claudin-1). They also alleviated pruritus by suppressing Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) and mitigated the allergic-inflammatory response, as shown by reduced Immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels and inhibited release of mast cell (MC) mediators (IL-4, IL-6, TNF-α). These effects were potentially mediated through modulation of the NF-κB pathway. Conclusion: By simultaneously mitigating skin barrier dysfunction, immune inflammation, and pruritus, SCSE and Sch B hold promise as therapeutic candidates capable of disrupting the self-perpetuating cycle of AD. These findings position SCSE and Sch B as a novel therapeutic strategy for this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.