ArticleNursing research and practice2026
Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Community Health Nursing Education and Practice: Opportunities, Ethical Challenges, and Future Directions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: A Bibliometric Analysis.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The swift advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted multiple industries. The prospects of AI within nursing education are especially promising, as it presents avenues for enhancing the preparation of forthcoming nursing practitioners in a constantly changing healthcare landscape. Methods: We employed VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the Bibliometrix R package to effectively visualize the bibliometric findings. Results: A total of 430 publications were identified. The predominant sources of these publications were the United States of America and China, while the National University of Singapore emerged as the foremost contributor. The journals that provided the most substantial input in this area Conclusions: The results of this investigation offer novel perspectives for scholars who are keen on examining the integration of AI in the training of nursing education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.