ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2026
Corneal dose response from exposure to a
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing small-animal molecular imaging through multifaceted innovation.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Laser safety studies of the eye are well documented for visible wavelength and continuous wave lasers. There are fewer experimental results for infrared wavelengths and pulsed lasers. Aim: We aim to fill the gap at 1645 nm for single nanosecond pulse duration exposures of rabbit cornea and determine the threshold radiant exposure to generate lesions 50% of the time (estimated dose Approach: Images of the cornea during exposures were acquired using slit lamp microscopy and optical coherence tomography. A histological analysis helped provide dosimetry relationships with morphology and mechanisms of the damage. Results: We measured the energy Conclusion: This experimental approach performed well to characterize damage and identify damage thresholds to inform the laser safety standard community of the accuracy of current exposure limits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.