Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41685217›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

How agency shapes behavior and performance: the triple impact of control-feedback on stimulus-response learning, motor reinforcement, and motivated action selection.

Noam Karsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Noam KarshSocial and Motor Cognition Lab, Department of Psychology, Tel-Hai College, Kiryat Shmona, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Agency confirmation via control feedback (e.g., an immediate sensory consequence of one's action) has been shown to motivate action choice and reinforce motor responses. Recent work also demonstrated that it qualitatively improves motor performance. The present study tested the hypothesis that this improvement arises because control feedback selectively strengthens stimulus-response (S-R) associations, and further examined its reinforcing impact on motor responses and action choice to provide an integrated account of how agency confirmation shapes behavior and performance. Methods: Three experiments employed an acquisition-test paradigm. During acquisition, specific stimulus-response combinations triggered an immediate perceptual effect, while other combinations produced no effect (Experiments 1 and 3) or a delayed effect (Experiment 2). In the test phase, the perceptual effect depended solely on the response (Experiments 1 and 2) or was absent (Experiment 3). Experiment 3 also included a free-choice phase assessing the motivating impact of control feedback on voluntary action selection and explicit knowledge regarding the S-R pairings. Results: Control feedback enhanced S-R learning, yielding faster and more accurate performance for previously reinforced pairings compared to delayed or no-effect conditions. Immediate response-contingent effect independently facilitated motor execution (Experiments 1 and 2), and reinforced S-R pairings biased action choice preference (Experiment 3) even without explicit awareness of the pairings. Discussion: Agency confirmation via control feedback exerts a triple and partially dissociable influence on behavior, enhancing S-R learning, reinforcing motor execution, and motivating voluntary action. The findings inform models of action control and motor skill learning.

Indexed as

action selectionagencycontrolmotivationmotor performancereinforcementstimulus–response association

Identifiers

PMID41685217
PMCPMC12891105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.