ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Prediction of infliximab and anti-drug antibody concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease using machine learning models with real-world data from a prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although population pharmacokinetic models are the standard approach for identifying inter-individual variability and optimizing infliximab concentration, their development and validation are complex and time-consuming. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models to predict infliximab and anti-drug antibody (ADA) concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving maintenance infliximab therapy. Methods: A total of 1,806 infliximab and ADA concentration measurements were prospectively collected from 149 IBD patients. Recurrent neural networks (RNN)-based models, including long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) architectures, as well as regression-based models such as Elastic Net, Support Vector Regression, Random Forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were developed. Recursive multi-step prediction was applied to evaluate short-term forecasting performance. Results: RF outperformed in predicting infliximab concentrations, and XGBoost yielded the best performance in predicting ADA levels (2-fold accuracy, 86.67% and 96.67%, respectively). The infliximab prediction model maintained acceptable accuracy up to two recursive predictions steps but exhibited a notable performance decline at the third step. In contrast, the ADA model showed robust performance across all three recursive steps, maintaining 2-fold accuracy exceeding 96%. Conclusion: ML models were developed to predict infliximab and ADA concentrations, with RF and XGBoost showing the best performance for infliximab and ADA prediction, respectively. The ADA model demonstrated stable multi-step forecasting capability. These models may support individualized dosing strategies and reduce the need for frequent therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.