Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41685171›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2026

The True Cost of Heat: Evaluating Heat-Related Mortality Estimation Methods in Texas.

Jesse R J Rutt, Andrew E Dessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jesse R J RuttTexas A&M University College Station TX USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2128-6481
Andrew E DesslerTexas A&M University College Station TX USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3939-4820

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different ways of counting heat-related deaths (HRD) can give you very different numbers. This study examines HRD in Texas using three different definitions: The Optimal Temperature Method (OTM) estimates mortality based on deviations from a community's optimal temperature, capturing the effects of both moderate and extreme heat exposure. This method finds that 2.2% of summertime Texas mortality were heat related over the period 2010-2023. The Extreme Heat Method (XHM) counts deaths associated with extreme temperatures; we find that temperatures exceeding the 95th percentile were responsible for 0.5% of summertime Texas mortality over this same period. This means that moderate heat is responsible for 77% of HRD, with extreme temperatures responsible for the rest. The Excess Death Method (EDM) approach quantifies the mortality burden as the increase in mortality compared to what would have occurred with the climate of a baseline period; we find that summertime Texas mortality over this period was 1.7% higher than with the climate of the mid-20th century. When comparing these estimates to official HRD values from the State of Texas, which are based on an official determination that heat contributed to the death, we find that official State HRD numbers appear to substantially underreport HRD, attributing just 0.3% of summertime deaths to heat, with the XHM method being the closest.

Indexed as

climate changeexcess deathsextreme heatheat‐related mortalitypublic healthTexas

Identifiers

PMID41685171
PMCPMC12892089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.