ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Development and application of a clinical psychological nursing training program for nursing interns based on the ADDIE model.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of an empathy ability index system for clinical nurses using the ADDIE model: a Delphi study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Integrating case-based learning into the ADDIE model for higher vocational rehabilitation nursing courses: a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and apply a clinical psychological nursing training program for nursing interns based on the ADDIE model, aiming to enhance their psychological nursing competencies. Methods: From August 1, 2023, to February 1, 2025, the five phases of the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) were adopted. First, the current status of clinical training was surveyed, and the content and format of training were analyzed to draft a preliminary training program. Then, two rounds of Delphi expert consultations (involving 14 experts) were conducted to optimize and finalize the program. Subsequently, a single-group pre-post intervention study was conducted, where the program was implemented among 75 nursing interns. Its effectiveness was evaluated using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE), and a self-designed knowledge assessment test. Results: The questionnaire response rates for both rounds of expert consultations were 100%. For first-level items, the mean importance scores ranged from 4.41 to 4.91, with coefficients of variation (CV) of 4.40-15.72%. For second-level items, the scores ranged from 3.78 to 4.93, with CVs of 4.56-19.42%. The finalized training program included 6 key aspects and 7 training formats. Conclusion: The program is scientifically sound, innovative, with easily understandable content and diverse formats. It shows significant training effectiveness and has guiding value for clinical training of nursing interns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.