ArticleCureus2026
Rare Intraoperative Presentation of a Coexistent Uterine Cystic Mass and Bilateral Ovarian Cystic Masses.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine cystic lesions are commonly encountered in clinical practice, but serosal cysts, such as uterine serous cystadenomas, are exceedingly rare. This case report highlights the rare occurrence of a large uterine serous cystadenoma, initially misdiagnosed as an ovarian cyst on preoperative imaging and later discovered intraoperatively to be an exophytic cystic mass arising from the uterus. It underscores the diagnostic challenge of differentiating large exophytic uterine cystic masses from ovarian cystic masses in patients with distorted anatomy on preoperative imaging. A 50-year-old postmenopausal woman, with no significant past medical or surgical history, was referred for incidental bilateral ovarian cysts detected on CT imaging due to abdominal pain. Transvaginal ultrasound confirmed the cysts, and tumor markers were within normal limits. Given her postmenopausal status, a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was planned. During surgery, a 15 cm cyst was found arising from the uterine fundus instead, along with multiple simple cysts on the uterus and small bilateral ovarian cysts. The patient underwent cyst aspiration and excision of the uterine cyst, along with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A hysterectomy was considered due to potential malignancy risk, but was deferred after benign findings on frozen section. Final pathology confirmed a benign Müllerian cyst consistent with serous cystadenoma, with no evidence of malignancy. This case illustrates the importance of intraoperative frozen section analysis and highlights the need for thorough preoperative imaging to guide surgical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.