ArticleCureus2026
Locomotion Training in a Care Prevention Program for Community-Dwelling Older Women in Japan: An Exploratory Pre-post Intervention Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction This study assessed changes in locomotive syndrome (LS) risk test scores following locomotion training (LT) in community-dwelling older Japanese women participating in a local government care prevention program and provided evidence for its effectiveness and dissemination. Materials and methods This interventional study employed a pre-post design and was conducted between September and December 2024. The participants were 14 women (mean age: 76.5 ± 4.5 years) who participated in a long-term care prevention program. A 76-day exercise intervention consisting of LT was implemented. LS was assessed pre- and post-intervention using the stand-up test, the two-step test, and the 25-item Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25). Results Three participants who were not classified as having LS pre-intervention remained in the non-LS category. Among the 11 participants who had LS pre-intervention, four individuals (36.4%) showed improvement in their LS stage, while seven (63.6%) remained in their LS stage. No participant experienced worsening of their LS stage. The GLFS-25 score improved significantly post-intervention [pre-intervention: median 6.5 (interquartile range: 3.0-14.3); post-intervention: median 4.5 (2.0-9.3); p = 0.011]. Conclusions As a program conducted within the limited time and resources of preventive care projects, LT may be suggested as an effective exercise intervention for improving musculoskeletal function in older individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.