SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Association between endometriosis and adverse reproductive and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of endometriosis on the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology in poor ovarian responders with previous implantation failures.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the increasing use of assisted reproductive technology (ART), more women with endometriosis are achieving pregnancy through ART. However, the impact of endometriosis on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes following ART remains controversial. This study aimed to clarify the association between endometriosis and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes through a meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify relevant studies published before March 12, 2025. Cohort studies comparing adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes between women with and without endometriosis undergoing ART were included. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 12.0 and R 4.3.2 software to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between endometriosis and adverse outcomes. Heterogeneity among studies was quantified using Cochran's Q test, I Results: A total of 29 cohort studies, including 93,071 women with endometriosis and 1,350,005 controls, were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with women without endometriosis, those with endometriosis undergoing ART had significantly lower clinical pregnancy rate (RR 0.850, 95% CI 0.726-0.994, 95% PI 0.570-1.267) and live birth rate (RR 0.716, 95% CI 0.556-0.923, 95% PI 0.341-1.504). They were also at higher risk for preterm birth (RR 1.277, 95% CI 1.187-1.373, 95% PI 1.024-1.591), placenta previa (RR 2.246, 95% CI 1.759-2.869, 95% PI 1.028-4.910), postpartum hemorrhage (RR 1.310, 95% CI 1.198-1.432, 95% PI 1.154-1.486), cesarean section (RR 1.296, 95% CI 1.165-1.441, 95% PI 0.944-1.779), low birth weight (RR 1.159, 95% CI 1.050-1.279, 95% PI 1.025-1.310), stillbirth (RR 1.219, 95% CI 1.032-1.440, 95% PI 0.930-1.597), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (RR 1.161, 95% CI 1.096-1.231, 95% PI 1.057-1.276). However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the risk of small for gestational age, miscarriage, preeclampsia, large for gestational age, or ectopic pregnancy (all Conclusion: Endometriosis significantly impacts pregnancy and perinatal outcomes following ART, increasing the risk of multiple adverse outcomes. These findings provide critical evidence for individualized reproductive treatment and perinatal care in women with endometriosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.