Article in PhytoKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
PhytoKeys · 2026
Article
4 · The record
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Jian RuKey Laboratory for Regional Plants Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Northeast Jiangxi, College of Life Science, Shangrao Normal University, Shangrao, 334001, Jiangxi, China College of Life Science, Shangrao Normal University Shangrao China https://ror.org/024qkwh22.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1268-3243
Xin-Yu ChengKey Laboratory for Regional Plants Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Northeast Jiangxi, College of Life Science, Shangrao Normal University, Shangrao, 334001, Jiangxi, China College of Life Science, Shangrao Normal University Shangrao China https://ror.org/024qkwh22.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8920-2112
Bo XuMountain Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Chengdu China https://ror.org/034t30j35.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3507-9321
Lian-Jin GuoKey Laboratory for Regional Plants Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Northeast Jiangxi, College of Life Science, Shangrao Normal University, Shangrao, 334001, Jiangxi, China College of Life Science, Shangrao Normal University Shangrao China https://ror.org/024qkwh22.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9078-1311
Wen-Bin JuMountain Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Chengdu China https://ror.org/034t30j35.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5665-6290
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.