ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Latent profiles of post-traumatic distress and growth in adolescents: the role of modifiable protective factors.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study examined heterogeneous patterns of trauma-related adaptation among Chinese adolescents during the post-COVID-19 recovery phase, focusing on the co-occurrence of posttraumatic distress (PTD) and posttraumatic growth (PTG). We also investigated how modifiable psychosocial protective and vulnerability factors were associated with membership in different adaptation profiles. Method: A large-scale cross-sectional survey was administered to 5, 044 students (aged 9-17 years; 46.6% male) from 15 primary and secondary schools in Wuhan, China. Validated instruments assessed posttraumatic stress symptoms (PCL-C), posttraumatic growth (PTGI), depressive symptoms (CES-D), and anxiety (SAS). Protective and vulnerability factors included resilience (CD-RISC), perceived social support (SSRS), physical activity (PARS-3), school belonging (PSSM), adaptive coping (SCSQ), and trait anxiety (TAI). Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify adaptation profiles, and multinomial logistic regression examined how modifiable psychosocial factors were associated with profile membership. Results: LPA revealed four empirically derived profiles: a High Distress/High Growth-Moderate PTSD profile (76.9%), a Low Distress-High Growth profile (4.8%), a Low Growth-Moderate Distress profile (3.9%), and a High Distress/High Growth-High PTSD profile (14.4%). The vast majority of adolescents showed some degree of both PTD and PTG, consistent with dual-process perspectives. In multinomial models, higher resilience, social support, school belonging, adaptive coping, and physical activity were associated with greater likelihood of belonging to the Low Distress-High Growth profile rather than more distressed profiles, whereas higher trait anxiety was associated with increased odds of membership in profiles characterized by greater distress. Conclusions: In this large school-based sample of Chinese adolescents, distress and growth frequently co-occurred and clustered into distinct adaptation profiles that differed systematically in psychosocial resources. Resilience, social connectedness, school belonging, and physical activity emerged as promising targets for trauma-informed, school-based support, whereas trait anxiety appeared to mark heightened vulnerability. Given the cross-sectional and single-region design, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory, and longitudinal and cross-cultural studies are needed to clarify temporal and contextual influences on adolescent trauma adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.