Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684741›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026

Burden of MASLD and liver fibrosis: evidence from Phenome India cohort.

Meghana Arvind, Anshul Verma, Sreeshma Raj K, Satyartha Prakash, Vignesh S Kumar, Mohammad Azhar Uddin, Ayushi Narayan, Mamta Rathore, Nancy Rawat, Ankita Sahu and 32 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors.

Meghana ArvindCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Anshul VermaCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Sreeshma Raj KCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Satyartha PrakashCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Vignesh S KumarCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Mohammad Azhar UddinCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Ayushi NarayanCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Mamta RathoreCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Nancy RawatCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Ankita SahuCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Yogesh KumarCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Pulkit Hasmukhbhai LeuvaCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Monika SharmaBiochemical Sciences Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, Maharashtra, 411008, India.
Rajesh SBiochemical Sciences Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, Maharashtra, 411008, India.
Dwaipayan SahaDivision of Cell Biology and Physiology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700032, India.
Ankita MridhaDivision of Cell Biology and Physiology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700032, India.
Ishant Jyoti NathCenter for Infectious Diseases, Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat, Assam, 785006, India.
Ashique HussainCenter for Infectious Diseases, Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat, Assam, 785006, India.
Borsha RajkumariCenter for Infectious Diseases, Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat, Assam, 785006, India.
Mamta ThapaCenter for Infectious Diseases, Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat, Assam, 785006, India.
Neha KumariCSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India.
Vishwapriya SDepartment of Pharmacology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India.
Shilpak ChatterjeeIICB-Translational Research Unit of Excellence, Department of Cancer Biology and Inflammatory Disorders, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700091, India.
Dipyaman GangulyIICB-Translational Research Unit of Excellence, Department of Cancer Biology and Inflammatory Disorders, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700091, India.
Ashish AwasthiCSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226031, India.
Vamsi K YenamandraCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Ajay Pratap SinghCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Aastha MishraCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Swasti RaychaudhuriCSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India.
Karthik Bharadwaj TallapakaCSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India.
Giriraj Ratan ChandakCSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India.
Mahesh J KulkarniBiochemical Sciences Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, Maharashtra, 411008, India.
Mahesh S DharneBiochemical Sciences Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, Maharashtra, 411008, India.
Romi WahengbamCenter for Infectious Diseases, Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat, Assam, 785006, India.
Umakanta SubudhiCSIR-Institute of Minerals & Materials Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751013, India.
Sagnik BiswasDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, 110029, India.
ShalimarDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, 110029, India.
Kumardeep ChaudharyCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Shantanu SenguptaCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Partha ChakrabartiAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India.
Viren SardanaCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Phenome India Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is rising globally, including in India, yet community-based data remain scarce. We address this critical knowledge gap by assessing the prevalence, distribution, and characteristics of MASLD subgroups and fibrosis, leveraging the Phenome India cohort. Methods: In this prospective study, we recruited 10,267 adults across 37 laboratories of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) from 27 Indian cities. All permanent staff members of the CSIR, including current employees, retirees, and their spouses who responded to the recruitment campaign and provided voluntary consent, were considered for participation in the Phenome India Cohort. Steatosis and fibrosis were assessed using Transient Elastography, along with associated clinical, biochemical, cytokine and anthropometric data. Overall, crude and age-adjusted prevalence rates were estimated in the study population and various subgroups. Findings: Of 10,267 individuals screened, 7764 were included, 3712 (47.8%) fulfilled MASLD criteria, corresponding to an age-adjusted prevalence of 38.9% (95% CI 37.2-40.6). Significant fibrosis, defined as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥8.2 kPa (≥F2), was more frequent in MASLD (6.3% [234 of 3688]) than in cases without-MASLD (1.7% [69 of 4027]), corresponding to an age-adjusted prevalence of 4.1% in MASLD. Overall age-adjusted prevalence of significant fibrosis was 2.4%, which clustered in older adults (>60 years) and in those with diabetes or obesity class II, with evidence of possible regional variation. Interpretation: MASLD affected over one-third of participants. Site-specific disparities were observed, which suggest the need for large-scale longitudinal studies to elucidate region-specific risk factors and temporal trends. Community-based awareness and targeted public health interventions across diverse geographical and socio-cultural settings in India may help curb the rising burden. Funding: The work was funded by CSIR, India grant HCP47.

Indexed as

Cardio-metabolicCohortLiver fibrosisMASLDPhenome IndiaPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID41684741
PMCPMC12892047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.