Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684721›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Evaluating biosecurity implementation in commercial broiler poultry production in Gujarat.

Bhoomika Joshi, Khushbu Rana, Akash Golaviya, Subhash Jakhesara, Prakash Koringa, Ayona Silva-Fletcher, Fiona Tomley, Haidaruliman Paleja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bhoomika Joshi *Department of Veterinary Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Khushbu RanaDepartment of Veterinary Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Akash GolaviyaDepartment of Veterinary Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Himmatnagar, Gujarat, India.
Subhash JakhesaraDepartment of Veterinary Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Prakash KoringaDepartment of Veterinary Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Ayona Silva-FletcherRoyal Veterinary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona TomleyRoyal Veterinary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Haidaruliman Paleja *Department of Veterinary Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Poultry farming is a critical livelihood and nutrition source in India, particularly with the rapid expansion of commercial broiler production. As operations grow, strong biosecurity practices are essential to protect flock health, reduce antibiotic use, and prevent disease outbreaks. However, limited information exists on how effectively biosecurity measures are implemented in many developing regions. This study evaluated the current status of biosecurity practices in commercial broiler farms in Gujarat, India. Methods: A structured questionnaire was administered to collect data on farmer demographics, farm characteristics, and biosecurity practices. Descriptive statistics, graphical summaries, and multivariate analyses were used to assess overall trends, identify weaknesses, and highlight key challenges in biosecurity implementation. Results: Most surveyed farms were medium-scale operations, though notable variation existed in flock size and management. Farmers were generally educated and primarily depended on poultry farming for income. Basic practices such as vaccination, manure disposal, and bird isolation were widely recognized. However, major gaps were identified in rodent control, carcass disposal (with 97% relying solely on burial), vehicle sanitation (absent in 53.85% of farms), and awareness of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which was low among 79.49% of respondents. Over half of the farmers had never received formal biosecurity training, and many reported challenges related to limited skilled labor, financial constraints, and inadequate veterinary support. Discussion: The findings demonstrate widespread reliance on poultry farming but highlight inconsistent adoption of critical biosecurity measures. Poor awareness of AMR, limited training, and infrastructural deficits pose substantial risks for disease spread and antibiotic dependence. Targeted interventions-including capacity-building programs, improved veterinary access, and affordable biosecurity tools-are necessary to strengthen farm resilience and support public health goals through reduced antimicrobial reliance and enhanced disease prevention.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancebiosecuritybroiler poultrycommercial poultry farmingGujarat

Identifiers

PMID41684721
PMCPMC12892967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.