ReviewCurrent research in food science2026
Unlocking the potential of rice bran protein: modification strategies and functional enhancements.
Review in Current research in food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Melon Seed Proteins: From Waste to Wellness-Functionality and Opportunities in Future Foods.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Rice Protein as an Alternative Ingredient for Sustainable Food Formulations: Nutritional Quality, Functional Properties, Health-promoting Potential, and Emerging Applications.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rice bran protein (RBP) is a high-quality plant protein with balanced amino acids and low allergenicity, but its industrial application is hindered by poor solubility and limited functionality. This review provides a critical analysis of modification strategies designed to overcome these challenges, categorizing them into physical, chemical, and biological approaches. Physical methods (e.g., ultrasound, high-pressure processing, extrusion) disrupt non-covalent interactions to improve solubility and interfacial properties. Chemical techniques, such as glycosylation and phosphorylation, enhance functionality through covalent conjugation, markedly improving emulsifying stability and solubility. Biological methods, including enzymatic hydrolysis and cross-linking, enable precise structural tailoring under mild conditions. A key contribution of this work is the introduction of a comparative, application-driven framework that systematically evaluates the efficacy, technological trade-offs, and optimal food applications of each method. The analysis highlights that the choice of modification must balance functional performance with considerations of scalability, cost, and clean-label requirements. Finally, future research priorities are identified, emphasizing the need for synergistic hybrid processes, performance validation in complex food matrices, and scalable process engineering. This comprehensive synthesis aims to guide the rational development of RBP as a sustainable, high-value functional ingredient for the food industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.