ReviewInternational journal of nursing sciences2026
A conceptual analysis of reflective supervision for creating a positive intensive care practice environment.
Review in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to explore and clarify the concept of reflective supervision as a professional self-care strategy to create a positive Intensive Care Unit (ICU) practice environment. Methods: Walker and Avant's eight-step concept analysis approach was utilized to identify and define the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of reflective supervision in the ICU. An extensive literature search was conducted across various databases, including Google Scholar, CINAHL, PubMed. Articles published from 2005 to 2025 were identified. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement to indicate the included articles and extract related data based on relevance. Results: Forty articles were included in the analysis. The identified attributes included the supervisor-supervisee relationship, effective communication, teamwork, collaborations, reflection, competencies, feedback, continuous support, and autonomous choice. The identified antecedents included participation, supportive supervision, flexibility, open-door policy, training, and motivation. Consequences impacting the success of reflective supervision were identified as promotion of resiliency, autonomy, work-life balance, self-awareness, increased self-esteem, professional development, critical thinking, increased job satisfaction, and enhanced commitment. Conclusions: Reflective supervision is a complex professional self-care strategy that enhances ICU practice, by promoting nurses' well-being, self-awareness, therapeutic skills, and professional development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.