Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684619›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing sciences2026

A conceptual analysis of reflective supervision for creating a positive intensive care practice environment.

Mpho Grace Chipu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mpho Grace ChipuDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Mmabatho, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to explore and clarify the concept of reflective supervision as a professional self-care strategy to create a positive Intensive Care Unit (ICU) practice environment. Methods: Walker and Avant's eight-step concept analysis approach was utilized to identify and define the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of reflective supervision in the ICU. An extensive literature search was conducted across various databases, including Google Scholar, CINAHL, PubMed. Articles published from 2005 to 2025 were identified. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement to indicate the included articles and extract related data based on relevance. Results: Forty articles were included in the analysis. The identified attributes included the supervisor-supervisee relationship, effective communication, teamwork, collaborations, reflection, competencies, feedback, continuous support, and autonomous choice. The identified antecedents included participation, supportive supervision, flexibility, open-door policy, training, and motivation. Consequences impacting the success of reflective supervision were identified as promotion of resiliency, autonomy, work-life balance, self-awareness, increased self-esteem, professional development, critical thinking, increased job satisfaction, and enhanced commitment. Conclusions: Reflective supervision is a complex professional self-care strategy that enhances ICU practice, by promoting nurses' well-being, self-awareness, therapeutic skills, and professional development.

Indexed as

Concept analysisIntensive Care UnitNursingPositive environmentReflective supervision

Identifiers

PMID41684619
PMCPMC12891789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.