Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684617›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2026

The effectiveness of the semi-virtual simulation teaching model based on the Standards of Best Practice of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning.

Peizhuo Shi, Ping Yang, Jingzhi Zhuang, Yanru Wang, Dong Pang, Qian Lu, Sanli Jin, Jinxiao Zhao, Wei Chen, Ke Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peizhuo ShiSchool of Nursing, Baotou Medical College, Baotou, China.
Ping YangSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jingzhi ZhuangCollege of Arts and Sciences, Cornell University, New York, USA.
Yanru WangSchool of Nursing, Baotou Medical College, Baotou, China.
Dong PangSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Qian LuSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Sanli JinSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jinxiao ZhaoDepartment of Outpatient, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ke LiOffice of Education, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiangping LiSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the semi-virtual simulation and traditional simulation teaching models based on the Standards of Best Practice (SOBP) according to the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) in the Adult Nursing course. Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental design. A total of 94 third-year nursing students from a university in Beijing between November and December 2022 were recruited as participants. An innovative semi-virtual simulation teaching model was designed based on the SOBP established by the INACSL. In the Adult Nursing course, both the semi-virtual and traditional simulation teaching models were implemented. At the end of the simulation sessions, participants completed the Chinese version of the Simulation Effectiveness Tool-Modified (SET-M) to assess the effectiveness of the two teaching models. Results: All nursing students completed the simulation sessions. There was no difference ( Conclusions: The study demonstrated equivalent effectiveness between the semi-virtual and traditional simulation teaching models. Semi-virtual simulation teaching model could offer a more flexible and feasible approach to simulation teaching.

Indexed as

Nursing educationNursing studentsQuasi-experimental studySemi-virtual simulationStandards of Best Practice

Identifiers

PMID41684617
PMCPMC12891799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.