ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2025
Red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio: a prognostic biomarker of sepsis patients.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To explore the association of red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio (RAR) with 28-day mortality among septic patients, as well as to develop predictive models for evaluating the prognostic significance of RAR. Material and methods: Relevant information was obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III). A total of 1475 individuals diagnosed with sepsis were enrolled. Data on patients' age, creatinine levels, and mechanical ventilation status in the initial 24 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission were gathered. We employed multivariate COX analyses to investigate the correlation between RAR and 28-day mortality, and we conducted subgroup analyses stratified by gender, age, intervention modality, and disease progression. We established 4 prediction models relevant to RAR to forecast the 28-day mortality of septic patients. Additionally, we evaluated the predictive value using receiver operator characteristic curves. Results: The significance of the association between RAR and 28-day mortality was maintained among sepsis patients regardless of their use or non-use of mechanical ventilation or vasopressor, presence or absence of septic shock, and gender (male or female). Additionally, these developed models associated with RAR demonstrated a good predictive value in forecasting the 28-day mortality rate among septic patients. Conclusions: This study provides evidence, suggesting a significant correlation between RAR and the 28-day mortality among sepsis patients of ICU admission. It might show promise of RAR as a potential dependable prognostic marker for the prediction of 28-day mortality in sepsis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.