ArticleJournal of medical physics
Assessing Axis-specific Set-up Errors in Rectal Cancer Radiotherapy: A Prospective Cone-beam Computed Tomography-Based Study with Body Mass Index Correlation.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07676032 (The Impact of Body Composition on Setup Errors in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy With Thermoplastic Mask Immobilization), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Impact of Body Composition on Setup Errors in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy With Thermoplastic Mask Immobilization: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface-Guided Radiotherapy for Vulvar Cancer in the Frog-Leg Position: Setup Accuracy and BMI Effects.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Inter-fractional Setup Errors and Anisotropic Margin Adaptation Using Daily Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Head-and-neck Radiotherapy.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to quantify set-up errors and derive optimal clinical target volume to Planning Target Volume (PTV) margins for rectal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, while also evaluating the influence of body mass index (BMI) on set-up accuracy. Materials and Methods: Data from 41 patients and 1102 daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were analyzed. For each patient and fraction, the mediolateral (X), craniocaudal (Y), and antero-posterior (Z) translational shifts were measured. Population systematic (Σ) and random (σ) errors were calculated from per-patient summary statistics (see Methods), and PTV margins were derived using the van Herk formula (margin = 2.5 Σ +0.7 σ). Results: The mean systematic set-up error was small: 0.04 mm (X), 0.57 mm (Y), and 0.13 mm (Z), reflecting high reproducibility of daily image-guided positioning. Using Σ and σ, the derived PTV margins were 7.4 mm (X), 9.1 mm (Y), and 9.7 mm (Z). A moderate positive correlation between BMI and the Z-axis set-up error was observed ( Conclusion: Nonuniform, axis-specific margins are essential to accommodate anatomical and physiological variability in rectal cancer radiotherapy. The use of daily CBCT significantly enhanced set-up precision. Findings align with ICRU 62/83 and QUANTEC recommendations and support individualized planning approaches, especially in diverse patient populations where BMI and pelvic anatomy may affect positioning accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.