Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684501›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical physics

Evaluation of Interfraction Dose Discrepancies in Organs at Risk, Clinical Target Volume, and Points A and B in Computed Tomography-based High-dose-rate Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer Patients.

Vishwadeep Mishra, Laxman Pandey, Ankita Pandey, Rachita Chatterjee, Sudeep Chanda, Archana Pandey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vishwadeep MishraDepartment of Radiotherapy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Laxman PandeyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ankita PandeyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rachita ChatterjeeDepartment of Pediatrics, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sudeep ChandaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Archana PandeyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Brachytherapy is an integral part of the management of carcinoma cervix. High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR ICBT) is often delivered after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in more than one session. The uncertainties may arise due to variations in anatomy and applicator position during each session, which may impact dose distribution to the clinical target volume (CTV) and normal organs. This study aims to quantify interfraction dose variations in HDR ICBT for cervical cancer patients using computed tomography-based planning. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 30 patients with carcinoma cervix of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2 to IVA after EBRT were included in the study. Total dose for ICBT was 21 Gy delivered in 3 weekly fractions. Doses to CTV, Point A, Point B, and normal organs (rectum, bladder, and sigmoid colon) were recorded in each session. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Chi-square test to compare dose variations between fractions, with a significance level set at Results: Mean dose received by 90% of the CTV was 5.92 Gy, 5.77 Gy, and 6.05 Gy for the first, second, and third fractions, respectively. Doses to 0.1 cc of bladder were 8.02 Gy, 7.17 Gy, and 7.51 Gy across fractions, whereas for 1 cc, doses were 6.17 Gy, 5.88 Gy, and 6.15 Gy, respectively. For 1 cc of rectum, doses were 5.60 Gy, 4.90 Gy, and 5.23 Gy, and for 2 cc, 5.17 Gy, 4.34 Gy, and 4.71 Gy, respectively, for three fractions. Sigmoid doses had relatively stable dose variation. Conclusion: Bladder, rectal, and sigmoid doses varied considerably across fractions, emphasizing the need for strict organ preparation protocols and adaptive dose monitoring.

Indexed as

Carcinoma cervixdose variationsdosimetryintracavitary brachytherapyPoint APoint B

Identifiers

PMID41684501
PMCPMC12893360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.