ArticleJournal of medical physics
Commissioning of Bilateral (Parallel Opposed) Extended Source-to-surface Distance Total Body Irradiation Technique and Its Long-term Stability.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This article describes the commissioning of a total body irradiation (TBI) technique using bilateral-parallel-opposed fields at extended source-to-surface distance (SSD). Material: The measurements are based on the actual patient treatment geometry, which requires the patient to be placed inside a Perspex box. The gaps between the patient and the walls of the Perspex box were filled with rice bags to achieve full scattering conditions. The TBI box's lateral separation can be adjusted to 42 cm, 52 cm, or 62 cm by inserting the removable side walls to either of the three pairs of slots. A Farmer chamber, inserted inside a water-equivalent plastic slab phantom placed under full scattering conditions, was used for depth dose and profile measurements. The extended SSD was 333.5 cm, and the available field size was 132 cm × 132 cm. For output measurement, dose-to-water calibration factors for 6 MV and 15 MV energies were derived for the extended SSD. Bilateral-opposed fields were measured at three different separations to calculate lateral tissue effects. Result: For the 6 MV and 15 MV beams at a 42 cm separation, the midline-to-surface dose ratios were 1:1.17 and 1:1.08, respectively. As the separation increased, this ratio increased faster for the 6 MV beam and slower for the 15 MV beam. For the end-to-end quality assurance test (monitor unit to dose verification), the noted deviations were - 2.16% for the 6 MV beam and - 1.27% for the 15 MV beam. Conclusion: This article presents the detailed commissioning and long-term stability of the extended SSD TBI technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.