ArticleJournal of medical physics
A Study of Feasibility for Reusing Thermoplastic Masks - Toward a Green Environment.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study evaluated the feasibility of reusing thermoplastic masks in radiation oncology to reduce environmental waste and financial costs. Materials and Methods: The study conducted from July 2024 to December 2024 involved 70 thermoplastic masks across three types: 3-clamp brain masks, 5-clamp head-and-neck masks, and 4-clamp chest/abdomen/pelvis masks. Measurements of fresh masks were compared to those after molding and re-flattening post-treatment. Dimensions were recorded in superior-inferior (SI) and lateral directions at specific anatomical levels. Results: The 3-clamp brain thermoplastic cast expanded 46% ± 7% in SI directions postmolding. Width increased by 63% ± 16% (chin) and 75% ± 10% (forehead). Re-flattened casts showed 25% ± 4% SI reduction and 19% ± 8% (chin) and 26% ± 5% (forehead) contraction in width. The 5-clamp head-and-neck thermoplastic cast expanded 16% ± 3% SI postmolding, with width expansion of 54% ± 15% (chest), 62% ± 10% (forehead), and 66% ± 5% (chin). Re-flattened casts showed 6% ± 3% SI expansion and 26% ± 5.5%, 40% ± 16%, and 37% ± 17% width enlargement at chest, chin, and forehead levels, respectively. The 4-clamp chest/abdomen/pelvis thermoplastic casts expanded 3% ± 5% (SI) in 26 casts and contracted by 7.5% ± 2.5% in 2 casts postmolding. Conclusion: Thermoplastic masks demonstrated acceptable dimensional changes while reusing, with consistent structural integrity and minimal compromise in functionality. Single reuse could significantly reduce costs and waste, particularly in resource-limited settings, making this practice a viable option for sustainable health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.