ArticleJournal of medical physics
DART-Net: A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Precise Radiotherapy Planning with Automated Multiorgan Segmentation and RTSTRUCT Generation.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying the spatial information loss of Dose-Volume Histograms in Gamma Knife radiosurgery via unsupervised 3D dose geometry embedding.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Clinically validated deep learning auto-contouring for glioblastoma volumetric modulated arc therapy planning: a dosimetric equivalence study.Radiation oncology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Manual delineation of pelvic organs remains a critical bottleneck in radiotherapy planning, consuming valuable clinical time and introducing interobserver variability. While existing deep learning approaches have shown promise, they struggle with complex anatomical boundaries and lack seamless integration into clinical workflows. This study addresses these limitations by introducing Dual-Attention Residual Technology Network (DART-Net), the first framework to unify dual-encoder architecture, attention mechanisms, and residual connections for automated segmentation and direct RTSTRUCT generation. Methods: Our novel architecture processes both raw and normalized computed tomography (CT) volumes simultaneously through parallel encoders, enabling superior feature extraction. The integration of attention mechanisms with residual connections, a combination previously unexplored in pelvic segmentation, allows precise focus on clinically relevant regions when preserving gradient flow. The model was trained on 125 expert-annotated pelvic CT scans with comprehensive data augmentation to ensure anatomical variability representation. Results: DART-Net achieved state-of-the-art performance with significant improvements over existing methods: Dice Similarity Coefficient scores of 0.965 for bladder (vs. 0.94 with prior methods), 0.908 for prostate, and 0.840 for rectum, with Hausdorff Distance values between 1.4 and 2.5 mm, representing an 18.6% reduction in bladder boundary error compared to the best previous approach. Expert validation by radiologists and radiation oncologists confirmed clinical acceptability of the auto-generated contours. The model uniquely automated bridges the research-practice gap through RTSTRUCT file generation, enabling seamless integration with commercial treatment planning systems. Conclusion: DART-Net establishes a new benchmark for artificial intelligence-assisted radiotherapy planning by harmonizing technical innovation with clinical practicality. By reducing contouring time and improving anatomical precision, this framework addresses critical workflow inefficiencies in radiation oncology when potentially enhancing treatment outcomes through more consistent organ delineation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.