ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2026
Comparison of pericapsular nerve group block versus supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block on postoperative pain management, quadriceps muscle strength, and early functional outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a prospective, randomized clinical study.
Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of different anesthesia methods on outcome of elderly patients undergoing hip surgery.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the effects of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) on quadriceps strength, postoperative analgesia, and functional scores following hip arthroscopy (HA) for patient complaining of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) under general anaesthesia. A prospective, randomized, and controlled trial recruited a total of 48 patients who had either PENG group or supra-inguinal FICB as a pain management modality. The primary outcomes were the postoperative quadriceps muscle power, and the secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid consumption, and functional scores; the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) and international hip outcome tool-12 (iHOT-12) score. All patients in PENG group were capable of performing a straight leg raise with hip flexion of >15°. In contrast, two patients in FICB group had postoperative falls and six patients (25%) were unable to perform a straight leg raise at 24 h postoperatively. At the time of admission to the post-anaesthesia care unit and at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, peak visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at rest were 6, 5, 4, and 4, respectively, in PENG group and 8, 7, 6, and 5, respectively, in FICB group (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.