Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684432›Full record

ReviewJournal of hip preservation surgery2026

Wide variations in the alpha angle reporting of the hip in asymptomatic individuals-a systematic review.

Martin Jakobsen, Maria Biesèrt, Mikael Sansone, Ayeni R Olufemi, Ioannis Kostogiannis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martin JakobsenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skånes Universitetssjukhus, Wigerthuset, Remissgatan 4, 22185, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8899-4633
Maria BiesèrtDepartment of Orthopaedics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skånes Universitetssjukhus, Wigerthuset, Remissgatan 4, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Mikael SansoneDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ayeni R OlufemiDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Ioannis KostogiannisDepartment of Orthopaedics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skånes Universitetssjukhus, Wigerthuset, Remissgatan 4, 22185, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The alpha angle is commonly used to quantify cam-type morphologies in hips. However, the threshold values that define a pathological alpha angle remains disputed. To identify the threshold values for the alpha angle measured on X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in asymptomatic individuals in different radiological modalities. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and checklist, a literature search was conducted in May 2024 by two independent reviewers. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched using the following search terms: ('Alpha angle') AND (('FAI') OR 'femoroacetabular impingement') AND ((((Imaging) OR CT) OR MRI) OR X ray). Of the studies identified, those measuring the alpha angle using either X-ray, CT, or MRI in an asymptomatic population were included. Study population and, if stated, demographics like gender, ethnicity, and activity level were then compiled using Excel as well as number of individuals and hips, imaging modality and view, method of evaluating symptoms, mean alpha angle, and 95% reference interval. Twenty-five articles were included in the review. Threshold values varied depending on what radiological method was used, with thresholds for X-ray ranging from 61.0° to 122.9°, thresholds for CT ranging from 50.0° to 95.3°, and thresholds for MRI ranging from 52.7° to 103.5°. According to current literature, threshold values indicating increased risk of FAI syndrome vary physiologically and depend on imaging view and modality. Therefore, no single cut-off reliably defines cam morphology and measurements should be interpreted within their clinical context.

Identifiers

PMID41684432
PMCPMC12891998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.