ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Tears and saliva as alternative matrices for minimally invasive assessment of acute stress and pain in sheep.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated tears and saliva as alternatives to blood for determining cortisol concentration in healthy and chronically lame Merino meat sheep with dermatitis interdigitalis contagiosa (DINCO). Twelve healthy (HEALTHY) and 36 sheep with DINCO were included. After enrollment and placement of a jugular vein catheter on day 0, sheep underwent daily clinical examination and tear, saliva, and blood sampling on days 1 to 6 to determine cortisol concentrations (tears: COT; saliva: COS; blood: COB). After a 4-day adaptation period, blood and tears were collected six times at defined intervals immediately after the application of standardized stressors during a 1-h treatment phase. Sheep with DINCO were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups and underwent claw treatment with or without pain control: the XYLA-IVRA group received sedation and retrograde intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA); the IVRA group underwent IVRA and received a placebo instead of sedation; the PLACEBO and HEALTHY groups received isotonic saline instead of sedation and IVRA. The HEALTHY group underwent sham claw treatment. Statistical analyses used linear mixed models (PROC MIXED, SAS 9.4). Saliva and tear collection was minimally invasive, repeatable, and consistently yielded sufficient material for analysis without adverse health effects. Cortisol was detected in saliva and tears at all time points, and concentrations did not differ between healthy and diseased sheep during the adaptation phase. Both matrices had lower concentrations than blood but correlated positively and significantly with each other (day 2,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.