ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Large language models for structured cardiovascular data extraction: a foundation for scalable research and clinical applications.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Secure, Scalable Large Language Model-Based System (CIDER) for High-Throughput Clinical Data Extraction From Medical Reports: Retrospective Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- From API to Action: A Multi-Model Comparison of OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta LLMs for Clinical Trial Data Extraction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The current state of artificial intelligence-based invasive coronary angiography image analysis: a systematic review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Automated full-text screening and accelerated reviews using large language models with context-aware agents: an exploratory analysis in biomarker research.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Automated extraction of information from cardiac reports would benefit both clinical reporting and research. Large language models (LLMs) hold promise for such automation, but their clinical performance and practical implementation across various computational environments remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and performance of LLM-based classification of echocardiogram and invasive coronary angiography reports, using real-world clinical data across local, high-performance computing and cloud-based platforms. Methods and results: The angiography and echocardiography reports of 1000 patients, admitted with acute coronary syndrome, were labelled for multiple key diagnostic elements, including left ventricular function (LVF), culprit vessel, and acute occlusions. Report classification models were developed using LLMs via (i) prompt-based and (ii) fine-tuning approaches. Performance was assessed across different model types and compute infrastructures, with attention to class imbalance, ambiguous label annotations, and implementation costs. Large language models demonstrated strong performance in extracting structured diagnostic information from cardiac reports. Cloud-based models (such as GPT-4o) achieved the highest accuracy (0.87 for culprit vessel and 1.0 for LVF) and generalizability, but also smaller models run on a local high-performance cluster achieved reasonable accuracy, especially for less complex tasks (0.634 for culprit vessel and 0.984 for LVF). Classification was feasible with minimal pre-processing, enabling potential integration into electronic health record systems or research pipelines. Class imbalance, reflective of real-world prevalence, had a greater impact on fine-tuning approaches. Conclusion: Large language models can reliably classify structured cardiology reports across diverse computed infrastructures. Their accuracy and adaptability support their use in clinical and research settings, particularly for scalable report structuring and dataset generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.