Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684372›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique2020

Semiparametric regression methods for temporal processes subject to multiple sources of censoring.

Tianyu Zhan, Douglas E Schaubel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tianyu ZhanDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.
Douglas E SchaubelDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-9792-4474

Funding

Survival Analysis Methods for Organ Failure DataR01DK070869 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOUGLAS EARL SCHAUBEL · 2005 to 2026
$4.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK070869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process regression methodology is underdeveloped relative to the frequency with which pertinent data arise. In this article, the response is a binary indicator process representing the joint event of being alive and remaining in a specific state. The process is indexed by time (e.g., time since diagnosis) and observed continuously. Data of this sort occur frequently in the study of chronic disease. A general area of application involves a recurrent event with non-negligible duration (e.g., hospitalization and associated length of hospital stay) and subject to a terminating event (e.g., death). We propose a semiparametric multiplicative model for the process version of the probability of being alive and in the (transient) state of interest. Under the proposed methods, the regression parameter is estimated through a procedure that does not require estimating the baseline probability. Unlike the majority of process regression methods, the proposed methods accommodate multiple sources of censoring. In particular, we derive a computationally convenient variant of inverse probability of censoring weighting based on the additive hazards model. We show that the regression parameter estimator is asymptotically normal, and that the baseline probability function estimator converges to a Gaussian process. Simulations demonstrate that our estimators have good finite sample performance. We apply our method to national end-stage liver disease data.

Indexed as

Additive hazards modeldependent censoringinverse weightingprevalencePrimary 62N01secondary 62D05semiparametric modelsurvival analysistemporal process regression

Identifiers

PMID41684372
PMCPMC12893071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.