Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684263›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in anaesthesiology2026

Machine learning for hemodynamic instability prediction and hemorrhage management in trauma and perioperative care.

Joshua Le, Walter Rusin, Alexandre Joosten, Maxime Cannesson, Ravi Pal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua LeLarner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA and.
Walter RusinDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Alexandre JoostenDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Maxime CannessonDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ravi PalDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

Machine Learning of Physiological Waveforms and Electronic Health Record Data to Predict, Diagnose, and Treat Hemodynamic Instability in Surgical PatientsR01HL144692 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Biomedical Informatics Tools for Applied Perioperative PhysiologyR01EB029751 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
Personalized Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection of Postoperative Failure to RescueR01EB035028 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Maxime Cannesson · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01EB029751 and R01HL144692NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144692NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029751NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB035028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHemodynamic instability and uncontrolled hemorrhage remain leading causes of preventable morbidity and mortality in trauma and perioperative critical care. This review summarizes recent advances in machine learning-based approaches for early detection before overt decompensation and for supporting time-critical hemorrhage management in trauma patients. RECENT

findingsRecent studies have explored machine learning across multiple stages of trauma care, including early warning systems, outcome and mortality prediction, prediction of massive transfusion needs, risk stratification, and bleeding monitoring. Outcome prediction - particularly mortality and complications such as sepsis - remains one of the most extensively studied domains. More recent work has increasingly favored neural network-based architectures, including deep and hybrid models, reflecting their capacity to model complex, high-dimensional, and temporal physiologic data, while ensemble methods such as extreme gradient boosting remain widely used due to their robustness to missing data and class imbalance. Although many models outperform traditional clinical scores in retrospective analyses, performance frequently declines during external validation, and few systems have demonstrated clinical impact in prospective or workflow-integrated settings. SUMMARY: Machine learning-based predictive analytics show promise for anticipating hemodynamic instability and guiding hemorrhage management before conventional vital-sign thresholds are crossed. However, clinical adoption remains constrained by data quality, generalizability, interpretability, and integration into time-critical workflows. Future progress will depend on incremental performance gains and physiology-informed model design, rigorous external validation, and careful positioning of machine learning tools as decision-support systems that augment - rather than replace - clinician judgment.

Indexed as

hemodynamic instabilityhemorrhage managementmachine learningperioperative trauma carepredictive analytics

Identifiers

PMID41684263
PMCPMC13685746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.