Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684205›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2026

Assessment of two minimally invasive methodologies for sex identification in the European eel, Anguilla anguilla.

Michael J Williamson, Jack A Brand, Kevin Hopkins, Luke O'Connor, Matthew W Perkins, Christopher Sergeant, Simon Spiro, Taina Strike, Jessica Whinfield, Rosie S Williams and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michael J WilliamsonInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9681-8920
Jack A BrandInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3312-941X
Kevin HopkinsInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.
Luke O'ConnorZoological Society of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3986-1097
Matthew W PerkinsInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.
Christopher SergeantInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.
Simon SpiroZoological Society of London, London, UK.
Taina StrikeZoological Society of London, London, UK.
Jessica WhinfieldThe Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5899-7566
Rosie S WilliamsInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.
Ethan WrigglesworthZoological Society of London, London, UK.
Rosalind M WrightEnvironment Agency, Feering, UK.
Adam T PiperInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9027-3066

Funding

Environment AgencyUK Research and Innovation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex is an important driver of variation in behaviour, ecology and physiology. Sex identification in the Critically Endangered European eel (Anguilla anguilla) currently requires fish sacrifice, or the use of morphological differences such as body length, which can be inaccurate in certain habitats and at intermediate body lengths. Non-lethal tools for accurate sex identification in this species are therefore required. Here, we test the efficacy of two minimally invasive methods of sex identification: (1) ultrasonography and (2) molecular markers taken from pectoral fin clips. Both methodologies were applied to riverine European silver eel and compared to histological sex identification. Ultrasonography accurately identified the gonads in female eel, with males identified by the absence of detectable gonadal structures. The level of expression of three molecular markers (dcn, LOC111853410, kera) previously used to identify sex in Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) were evaluated. There was no significant differential expression of the three molecular markers between sexes, suggesting that these markers cannot be accurately used to identify sex in European eel. Our findings suggest that minimally invasive imaging using ultrasonography can be a reliable tool for identifying sex in early-stage adult migratory European eels, with particular use at intermediate sizes (400-500 mm) and animals in habitats where migration potential is limited and may regularly exceed typical growth sizes. This technique can be highly valuable for studies that address ecological, behavioural, conservation and management issues in this Critically Endangered species.

Indexed as

AnguillaSex Determination AnalysisAnimal FinsAnimalsFemaleGonadsMaleUltrasonographyanguillid eelfishmolecular markersnon‐sacrificialsex determinationultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41684205
PMCPMC13357247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.