ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
Quantitative Analysis of Cochlear-Carotid Recesses Based on HRCT in Endoscope-Assisted Management of Massive Petrous Bone Cholesteatoma.
Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ImportanceOpening the cochlear‒carotid recesses through the endoscope-assisted modified translabyrinthine approach to treat lesions in the petrous apex has been demonstrated to preserve the cochlea and hearing. The objective parameters of recesses and their relationships with vital structures were fundamental to the effective application of this technique.ObjectiveHerein, we present a quantitative analysis of cochlear‒carotid recesses on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images and discuss their implications for hearing preservation in the surgical management of massive petrous bone cholesteatomas (PBCs).DesignObservational study.ParticipantsTwenty samples (40 sides) obtained between April and June 2021 radiographically via HRCT.MethodsHRCT images of 40 ears were acquired at 0.60 mm thickness and processed via Mimics. The intrinsic structures of the temporal bone were reconstructed in a 3D view. The morphological data were precisely measured on multiplanar reconstructed images. In addition, clinical implications were demonstrated in one patient with massive temporal bone cholesteatoma.ResultsA 3D model of the cochlear‒carotid recesses was reconstructed. The recesses were essentially divided into 2 parts, namely, the triangle anterior and superior to the cochlea (TASC) and the triangle anterior and inferior to the cochlea (TAIC). The size of the cochlear‒carotid recesses varied widely among the samples. The TASC was accessible in 80% of the samples via a conventional ear endoscope with a diameter of 3 mm, while the applicability of the TAIC was 62.5%. We further discovered that the low position of the trigeminal nerve impression and the small distance between the cochlea and the jugular bulb suggested narrow recesses. The thickness of the compact bone shell of the cochlear lumen acted as a safe drilling divider.ConclusionsHRCT and 3D reconstruction clearly displayed cochlear‒carotid recesses. For patients with massive PBC, the use of an endoscope to open recesses is feasible in the majority of cases and increases the possibility of preserving the structure and function of the cochlea. Individualized preoperative measurements of cochlear‒carotid recesses via HRCT could help surgeons perform safe and accurate dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.