Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684167›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026

No Differences in Muscular Adaptations to Long-Term Resistance Training Between Young Strict Vegetarian and Non-Vegetarian Women.

Gabriela Lucciana Martini, Marcio Beck Schemes, Bruno Strey, Cláudia Dornelles Schneider, Carolina Guerini de Souza, Ronei Silveira Pinto

Registry-linked trialAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05576337 (Comparison of Neuromuscular Characteristics of Strict Vegetarians and Non-Vegetarians Women and Their Adaptations After 16 Weeks of Strength Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05576337 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Neuromuscular Characteristics of Strict Vegetarians and Non-Vegetarians Women and Their Adaptations After 16 Weeks of Strength Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRan2022 to 2024Enrolled128ConditionsHypertrophyArms16 weeks of strength training protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriela Lucciana MartiniExercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4497-3029
Marcio Beck SchemesGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3850-623X
Bruno StreyExercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6537-8872
Cláudia Dornelles SchneiderGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9649-0643
Carolina Guerini de SouzaGraduate Program in Food, Nutrition and Health (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9202-1372
Ronei Silveira PintoExercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5827-5723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some evidence suggests that strict vegetarian and non-vegetarian diets may influence muscular adaptations to resistance training (RT), but findings remain inconsistent. This study compared muscular and body composition adaptations in strict vegetarian (VEG) and non-vegetarian (NV) women following a 16-week RT program without protein supplementation. Twenty-five VEG (28.7 ± 4.6 years) and 20 NV (30.9 ± 6.5 years) trained twice per week while maintaining their usual diets. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included thigh and calf muscle thickness (MT) via ultrasonography, composite maximal strength (knee extensor, knee flexor, and plantar flexor 1-RM), and whole-body composition assessed by DXA. Dietary intake was monitored throughout the intervention. Both groups showed significant increases in thigh MT (VEG: 81.2 ± 9.9 to 85.6 ± 9.6 mm; NV: 80.8 ± 9.9 to 87.3 ± 9.6 mm; all p < 0.001) and in composite maximal strength (VEG 106.9 ± 21.3 to 132.6 ± 21.6 kg; NV 107.9 ± 21.3 to 133.1 ± 21.8 kg; all p < 0.001), with no differences between groups. Thigh lean soft tissue (LST) increased significantly in both groups (p < 0.001), while calf LST, gastrocnemius medialis MT, total fat mass, and bone mass remained unchanged (all p > 0.05). VEG consumed significantly less protein (1.0 ± 0.3 g/kg) than NV (1.3 ± 0.3 g/kg; p = 0.002), yet no between-group differences were observed in muscle hypertrophy or strength gains. Despite lower protein consumption in the VEG group, no differences in muscle size and maximum strength adaptations were observed between strict vegetarian and non-vegetarian women after a long-term RT program. Trial Registration: This study was also registered at Clinical Trials (NCT05576337).

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalDiet, VegetarianMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingAdultBody CompositionFemaleHumansThighUltrasonographyYoung Adultdual energy X‐ray absorptiometryhypertrophymuscle strengthskeletal musclevegetarian diet

Identifiers

PMID41684167
PMCPMC12902596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.